Wendy Kopp, CEO of Teach for All, suggests in the Wall Street Journal that we call off the education arms race.
I agree. She’s referring to viewing education system effectiveness, as measured by standardized test scores across countries as a competition.
We should be happy that other countries are doing so well. Isn’t that good for us to live in a more educated world? Perhaps we might even be able to learn something from them, if we care to.
Or maybe we’ll just discover that they’re really good test takers.
The Wall Street Journal also offers this piece today about the education arms race, which says:
Since 1998, the Program for International Student Assessment, or Pisa, has ranked 15-year-old kids around the world on common reading, math and science tests. The U.S. brings up the middle—again—among 65 education systems that make up fourth-fifths of the global economy.
I have a few other thoughts to consider.
How well do PISA scores on reading, math and science correlate with prosperity now and in the future? Perhaps there’s a threshold that is good enough and, for whatever reason, the other countries are, to their own detriment, are far surpassing that.
For years I’ve heard that U.S. doesn’t have government health care and it results in sub par medical care performance vs. countries that do.
We do have government education, yet that still seems to result in sub par performance. So, maybe whether the government provides something isn’t the key to success. Maybe there are other factors.
Though, I must say that I do see as one bad outcome of our education system our inability to be able to put such results in proper perspective.