Tweet from Tom Byer:
The following example supports that point.
Setting: Sideline of scrimmage at youth soccer practice where I assisted.
Team One: Academy, top division team.
Team Two: Beginner to intermediate, but a year older.
If you judge the the teams before they scrimmage each other you might expect Team Two to dominate. They are older, bigger and look more athletic. A lot of the Team One players look bookish.
Once scrimmage begins, you quickly learn you are mistaken. Team One dominates and keeps the ball 90% of the time.
When Team Two gets the ball, they are lucky to get three touches before giving it back to Team One.
It’s like watching 6th graders (Team One) compete against 2nd graders (Team Two) in math. Of course, the 6th graders will look like geniuses, if you have nothing else to compare to.
But, Team One isn’t great, even though they are “elite” and win a lot.
They just have the basics down. Algebra, geometry, trigonometry and calculus are still to come.
Team Two represents the bottom 60-70% in my area and Team One the top 10%.
Comparing to traditional US sports of basketball and baseball, a team with a similar level of proficiency in either of those sports as Team One has in soccer would be low B or C level and Team Two would be in the bottom 10%, if playing at all.
Here are some key differences I noticed between Team One and Two players.
When players wait on the sideline to sub into scrimmage, Team One players work with the ball without being led. They juggle in groups, play 1v1, pass or dribble around backpacks and water bottles. They can all juggle 50 to 100.
Players from Team Two need need adult direction or they goof off. They think the academy players juggle to show off. “You don’t use it in a game,” they reason.
Team Two player have played organized “soccer for years.” They will tell you that, but they also exhibit no interest in discovering the sport on their own. They don’t see the need to touch the ball outside of practice and could barely name a single player on the local pro team. They are a step better than beginners, learning close to 100% of what they know about soccer through the team. They are often the first ones in their family to play soccer.
Team One also played organized soccer for years. But, its players are curious about learning to master the ball and game, learning about 90% of what they know outside of organized soccer through family and/or on their own. Many came from families whose parents played soccer, or have older siblings who play.
That’s what Tom Byer means by raising the bottom to lift the top. If Team Two had basic proficiency, they would push Team One harder to improve.
In non-soccer cultures the mindset is that kids learn soccer in organized settings with qualified professionals at the helm.
Byer’s suggests flipping that by expecting kids to learn the basics before they join a team.
That’s more like how we think of basketball and baseball. That’s part of the reason we start playing catch with kids when they’re toddlers and buy them Fisher-Price basketball hoops.
Parents expect more from soccer coaches than coaches of other sports. If their kid can’t make a basket, they encourage their kid to practice more.
That mindset is flipped in soccer. If their kid can’t score a goal, they ask why the coach hasn’t taught them how, yet, and start to doubt if the coach knows what they’re doing.