On the Today show, this morning, I saw Savannah interviewing Rep. Paul Ryan about the tax bill.
She pushed hard on the cut in corporate tax rate in the plan.
His response was valid.
We have the highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world. It will be good for the economy to be more competitive, so companies stay here and invest more here.
She pushed again…but Michael Bloomberg, CEO of a large company, says he won’t invest more here. He’ll buy back more stock.
Ryan’s response was valid. That’s one anecdote against studies that show otherwise.
But I think he missed a golden opportunity.
Here’s what my response would have been:
It’s great that Bloomberg supports our position.
I envision Guthrie getting confused look at this point and responding with, But he said he would not invest more. How does that support your position?
He said he’d buy back stock. Basic corporate finance tells us that stock buybacks is one way to return money to owners. Paying dividends is the other. Ask any first year B-school student.
What do investors do with money they receive from their investments?
Often, they invest it elsewhere.
While Bloomberg’s company might not have good projects to invest in (which may be a problem for Bloomberg), other companies might.
With more money in their pockets, the folks who sold shares to Bloomberg will be able to invest more in companies that have better investment prospects, like Google or Facebook or start-ups building better solar panels, curing cancer or the company that might disrupt Bloomberg’s own business model.
So, the economy still gets the benefit of the reduced corporate tax rate, even if companies, like Bloomberg’s, don’t directly invest their extra cash. Others will be more than happy to.