This looks pretty cool:
But, I think this is still too top-down.
In my mind, it’s more about the USSF putting the right incentives in place and letting the regional and professional structure emerge from that.
That requires the USSF to see itself as the facilitator of competition rather than architects that believe they know what’s best.
The three basic incentives are:
- Solidarity payments
- Training compensation
The first incentive (pro/rel) encourages people to invest in clubs to earn their way to the top by putting the best team on the field.
The second and third incentives encourage people to invest in clubs that will search for, train and gain exposure for all talent, not just the talent that can afford to pay club fees. These clubs aren’t as interested in climbing the pro/rel ladder, as they are in spreading the game and giving kids a chance to learn it.
If you put these incentives in place in soccer in the U.S., you get a soccer landscape that looks more like Silicon Valley and less like Mussolini.