Here’s a couple (paraphrased) good points made by callers to a radio show that I heard on the way to work this week.
Caller 1 — About the sequester budget cuts:
They expected us all to take the hit to pay the extra 2% in payroll tax at the beginning of the year. Why shouldn’t we expect government to take a hit once in a while?
Caller 2 did a great job illustrating the silliness of false choices often presented by politicians facing budget cuts:
Let’s say I take home $1,000 a week in pay. The payroll tax increase kicks in and that costs me $20 a week. Who’s going to believe it when I say, “Now I won’t have lunch money for my kids and they won’t be able to eat lunch.” Nobody…they’ll ask me if there are other expenses I could cut first. Why not cut back on the beer or Starbucks? They’ll tell me that I can make lunch for my kids to take to school.
But, why, when politicians use this tactic do people accept it as if there are no other alternatives.