In this post at Cafe Hayek, Don Boudreaux points us to a 1 and a half minute long video of himself describing why he is a Libertarian.
He cites two reasons:
1) The way he was raised — don’t be envious, make no excuses, be responsible for yourself.
2) His exposure to economics — Supply and demand curves showed him how the government imposition of price ceilings on oil caused him to have to wait in long lines at gas stations in the 70s.
If these two things led naturally to libertarianism, like Boudreaux indicates in the video, I would expect there to be many more libertarians out there. I would especially expect there to be more libertarian economists.
A self-described “left-of-center” commenter made the observation that he could agree with almost everything Don said in the video, but not be libertarian.
I tend to agree with this commenter. Maybe Don is trying to get the point across that libertarians aren’t extremist hermits. That most anyone right of “left of center” have a great deal in common with libertarians. Perhaps, even if they were to take a blind political challenge that many would fall out as libertarians — and they don’t now because of branding (libertarianism isn’t cool) or misunderstanding (libertarianism doesn’t mean an ‘on your own society’).
But, I do think that Don leaves out a key element of what causes one to appreciate liberty. I think there are many good reasons for liberty. It seems morally right. It also generally results in better outcomes than other things.
But, the key difference I see in libertarians and others is when they feel the use of force is warranted.
Libertarians (though they come in many flavors) tend to think the use of force is warranted only to prevent someone from infringing on the liberty of others.